it's hard to find people who have dyno'd their stock 3.8s.
It's a good solid engine (once the head gaskets are addressed) and it will run forever with proper maintenance. They are capable of extremely respectable highway mileage numbers even in our cars. They just don't make a ton of power.<crying with tears of "why, why did i get a V6???">
But I also understand that among automotive enthusiasts, when two engine variants are available, the more powerful one is preferred.
I disagree I get compliments all the time with my SC. As far as power goes it was good for it’s time. Early 90’s cars just didn’t put out high hp engine’s back then with the exception of maybe a few specialty cars. The SC does have a nice torque curve to it so it does pick up fast. I just used to have a old 89 Base model and now I have a SC, I just don’t think they should be compared because they are different in a lot of ways.It is just seen as a quick and dirty V6 when Ford needed something in the early 80's to fill that gap. It is just a boring pushrod 90 degree V6. It doesn't have variable valve timing and/or dual overhead cams and aside from the SuperCoupe (which nobody knows anything about anyway) it never really made any big power (maybe less so with the later split port engines). It had a reputation for blowing head gaskets. They aren't spectacularly great at anything. All of those things cemented its reputation long before anyone would car if it were installed in a FWD car. I think they are fine little engines that get no respect and who cares. If I cared what anyone else thought I'd be driving a Mustang. They share a surprising amount in common with the Buick 3800 which is seen as one of the better pushrod engines of its time. The difference is GM started with crap and kept refining it and making it better. Ford just kept making it and other than MPFI didn't do a ton to it and that's okay. We still love it.
when I needed to get going quickly - that's when the lack of power showed itself.
The V6 was the most powerful engine available for the MN12 ..
Well, I was thinking 1997 which is the model year of those two charts.
Generally speaking, and nobody get mad at me, I tend to forget about the SC, likely because I'm not the sporty type. I'm more into the whole personal luxury car plushness thing.
I also have to say that today's obsession with forced induction is getting a bit old. I mean some modern engines are turbocharged and supercharged. When you drive an old car, and especially if you're like me fairly new to even doing minor work on an engine, all that superfluous plumbing is a bit intimidating.
Ford modeled the Ford V6 after the Buick V6. Though they won't admit it. And yes, GM does / did have a better V6. Look what Buick did with the Grand National. I will say I am impressed with what Ford did with the 2.3l 4 banger in the SVO Mustang. Awesome feat.They share a surprising amount in common with the Buick 3800 which is seen as one of the better pushrod engines of its time. The difference is GM started with crap and kept refining it and making it better. Ford just kept making it and other than MPFI didn't do a ton to it and that's okay. We still love it.
Not for the weak mechanic, that is for sure....... all that superfluous plumbing is a bit intimidating.
Ford modeled the Ford V6 after the Buick V6. Though they won't admit it. And yes, GM does / did have a better V6. Look what Buick did with the Grand National. I will say I am impressed with what Ford did with the 2.3l 4 banger in the SVO Mustang. Awesome feat.