That's exactly what i was thinking. Unless WeC TIG welds (and god knows what kind of allow this spacer is made of), this spacer may just be the best solution short of take a plate , outline an intake gasket, and start drilling holes.For the upper intake? You could probably just use a spacer like this to build from
View attachment 4504
You need to download an existing CAD design, modify it (since the one I found is 1" thick and you probably only need 1/4" for making a flange), upload it to one of these sites and they'll quote you a price in different materials. A week or so later it arrives at your front door at a surprisingly reasonable price. Just buy more than the # you need as the cost is in the initial setup and adding a few more pieces isn't all that much.My machine is only capable of MIG at the moment, and only runs DC anyways so aluminum is out.
I like Gunns. Am I able to actually order those from a company or do I need to send the file to someone near me?
ITBs are the plan.Are you thinking breadbox type? Or are you going to be amazing and make this:
View attachment 4552
ITBs are the plan.View attachment 4555
This is on IG. A company is looking to make an adapter for the HO intakes, not GT40s.
I know. And there is a switch in the tune file to run the MBE2 with a MAP vs a MAF.I looked into this a while ago for giggles.
Q: Don't most of these ITB intakes support a MAP sensor (vs a MAF) so you need to switch you ECU to some variant that supports this kind of airflow measuring?
I suspect that means rewiring it it so you run a Mustang ECU (pre SN95) for the 5.0 OR just go completely aftermarket.
The problem is more than just how to get the air into the engine.
Least Hassle: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/2005-bmw-m3-coupe-138/I know. And there is a switch in the tune file to run the MBE2 with a MAP vs a MAF.
And I understand the complications that come with it. I don't really care. I'll deal with it and get there. I want ITBs.
The Mazda 787B has ITB trombonesI always wanted to get some stainless tubing that would fit inside each other, sealed with orings, and rig it in a frame for a variable length runners for itb. Start long, and drop the length as rpm goes up. Optimal runners for every rpm.
I didn't say it was new -- just that it was new to me.Iheard that story back when he was vp. Multiple people said it happened. It's not new, and I know a bunch of city folk with similiar stories.
Iheard that story back when he was vp. Multiple people said it happened. It's not new, and I know a bunch of city folk with similiar stories.
"I called a bad dude named cornpop Esther Williams" is totally a "I tied an onion to my belt, because that was the style at the time" moment.Yep, here’s the story
Anyone interested in a 396-swapped G-body?
My brother-in-law bought it when he was a teenager. He and his dad did the engine swap and it became his first car. Now that he is an adult with big boy money, he's ready to sell it and buy a big boy toy. It's currently at my house for a few more weeks until he ships it to where he lives in western Michigan. It's got a Holley 4-barrel and Edelbrock Performer manifold.
He just had a shop go through everything and replace all the fluids and maintenance items, so it runs and drives really well. It's a riot on the roads. Definitely a smiles-per-gallon kind of car (or gallons-per-smile in this case). No rust either. We got it up on a lift a couple weeks ago and it's still a solid body.
Technically the 3rd Gen was called a G-body. It's that awkward generation as they transitioned to FWD. I think you could use both A or G by definition.Isn’t it technically a A body? I didn’t think GM started calling them Gs until the FWD A body(Celebrities, Cieras) came into production in 81 or 82?
I know I know, pedantic. Guilty as charged
Technically the 3rd Gen was called a G-body. It's that awkward generation as they transitioned to FWD. I think you could use both A or G by definition.