Post a picture you took today

In 1974, realize the competition; everything else was either a 1000 cc "japanese shitbox", or a v8 luxobarge. Those probably got 15 mpg! That's awesome for a 5.0 v-8 of that era.these were sexy as hell for the period. The Camaro and firebird ate them alive with the 6.6l v8, but compared to the toyotas, tbirds, andPintos, those rocked! This killer babe I knew had a black and gold firebird with a 6.6l got 8mpg around town. I'd hate to know how much it cost for the beach trip we took.
 
I don't think my dad has ever bothered measuring the economy of his T/A. Maybe I'll ask and see what he says. :) It's a 76 with the 455.
 
I just hate that the babe I knew punched hers thru a guardrail at over 100mph, and killed both of them. :(
They were the last awesome of that era, really. In 1966, gas was as low as $.19 a gallon; in '78 when I got the IT, it was at $.50; and by 1980 ( HS for me, it was over $1.00. I drove a 63 tbird to HS. That 390 ate gas like crazy ,lol. A buddy had a vw bug, and you could fill it up for $10, and drive a week. $10 took me to the lake and back, lol.
 
Grog6 said:
In 1974, realize the competition; everything else was either a 1000 cc "japanese shitbox", or a v8 luxobarge. Those probably got 15 mpg! That's awesome for a 5.0 v-8 of that era.these were sexy as hell for the period. The Camaro and firebird ate them alive with the 6.6l v8, but compared to the toyotas, tbirds, andPintos, those rocked! This killer babe I knew had a black and gold firebird with a 6.6l got 8mpg around town. I'd hate to know how much it cost for the beach trip we took.
Click to expand...

It’s a fatter heavier and uglier Pinto.

In 1974 there was no V8 option in the Mustang II period, just like the 89-90 MN12s, the 2.8 cologne V6 was the top option even in the Mach 1. Ford stuffed the 302 and it’s whopping 130 horsepower into it in 1975 after extensive retooling of the rad support and all it did was make it nose heavy.
 
Looking out into the rain where my freshly washed Bird gets dirty...I am pondering the concept of luxury in automobiles.

Well, I started thinking about that category of "Personal Luxury Car". What does luxury mean here exactly? Consider that Thunderbird in the 90s was, iirc, less expensive than say Taurus.

I realize that I think of luxury mostly in terms of aesthetics (rather than in terms of feature content). A two-door immediately looks more luxurious to me for example. Overall length helps a lot.

This is the least expensive car I've owned, yet it feels the most luxurious!

20241001_124208.jpg
 
Grog6 said:
Be as pedantic as you want when I'm wrong,lol! I can remember seeing the first load of the mustang 2's coming off the truck. I fell in love with a blue on white cobra!
1b52dc279646daba8ed0b1ea5c564f36732d2e41.jpeg
Click to expand...
Nice Pinto.
 
1997ThunderbirdLXV6 said:
Looking out into the rain where my freshly washed Bird gets dirty...I am pondering the concept of luxury in automobiles.

Well, I started thinking about that category of "Personal Luxury Car". What does luxury mean here exactly? Consider that Thunderbird in the 90s was, iirc, less expensive than say Taurus.

I realize that I think of luxury mostly in terms of aesthetics (rather than in terms of feature content). A two-door immediately looks more luxurious to me for example. Overall length helps a lot.

This is the least expensive car I've owned, yet it feels the most luxurious!

View attachment 7949
Click to expand...
It is a shame she is on the street.
 
Pinto's never came with 5.0's. And all the foxbodys are the same, lol. Fairmont parts interchange too. I have a 3.55 gearset from a '80 fairmont in an irs diff I'm rebuilding.
 
Grog6 said:
In 1974, realize the competition; everything else was either a 1000 cc "japanese shitbox", or a v8 luxobarge. Those probably got 15 mpg! That's awesome for a 5.0 v-8 of that era.these were sexy as hell for the period. The Camaro and firebird ate them alive with the 6.6l v8, but compared to the toyotas, tbirds, andPintos, those rocked! This killer babe I knew had a black and gold firebird with a 6.6l got 8mpg around town. I'd hate to know how much it cost for the beach trip we took.
Click to expand...
My comment was more based on the looks of those than their practicality. I'm glad I didn't live thru the 70's to see that gas/oil crisis.
 
Grog6 said:
Pinto's never came with 5.0's. And all the foxbodys are the same, lol. Fairmont parts interchange too. I have a 3.55 gearset from a '80 fairmont in an irs diff I'm rebuilding.
Click to expand...
The Mustang II isn’t a fox body, the only thing they have in common is the steering rack, which is basically the same as our rack. Mustang IIs didn’t come with 8.8s either, the 8.8 didn’t even come into existence until 79 IIRC

The 5.0 in the Mustang II is weaker than most V6s, it’s not much to brag about
 
"After insurance totals your car, go to the yard that has it and buy it back"

For parts at least. Damn parts are getting harder and harder to find. Busted a hub cap and only found one on eBay for $10.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Back
Top